Informational Purposes Only

We do not encourage or condone gambling where it may be against the law.

Recent Posts

Houston Favored to Win American League Pennant

June 22, 2017

Pair of NFL Coaching Changes Bettors Should Know

June 21, 2017

Public Likes Wins Totals for Raiders and Jets

June 20, 2017

Houston Astros Betting Favorites for 2017 World Series

June 20, 2017

Tom Brady Early Betting Favorite to Win NFL MVP

June 19, 2017

NBA Draft Attracting More Attention This Year

June 18, 2017

Betting for McGregor vs Mayweather Jr. Bout Heats Up

June 17, 2017

Major League Baseball Runline Betting

June 16, 2017

Odds for Mayweather vs McGregor Announced

June 15, 2017

Golden State Is Favorite Bet of American Bettors

June 15, 2017

Sports Betting in United Kingdom

June 14, 2017

New Campaign to Legalize Sports Betting Backed by Casino Industry

June 14, 2017

Youwager Online Sportsbook

Betting Trends to Consider for NCAA Tournament First Round

March 15, 2017

The full-field of the NCAA Tournament will tip off between Thursday and Friday and here is a look at the betting trends for the different seeding matchups.

The No. 1 seed beating the No. 16 seed in the first round is as sure as it gets. The top seeds are an incredible 128-0 straight up against No. 16 seeds since 64 teams have played in the tournament. However, during the past four tournaments the No. 1 seeds are a combined 6-10 against the spread versus No. 16 seeds.

No. 2 seeds against No. 15 seeds have been dead even since 2008. No. 2 seeds have an 18-18 ATS record against No. 15 seeds dating back to 2008. However, No. 2 seeds have been upset by No. 15 seeds in four games dating back to 2012. No. 15 seeds that are 18-point dogs are higher are 7-1 ATS since 2008.

In each of the last four NCAA tournaments, one or more No. 14 seeds have upset the No. 3 seed outright. No. 14 seeds that are dogs of 12 points or more versus No. 3 seeds have covered the number in 6 of the past 8 games since 2013.

During the last three seasons, the No. 4 seeds have won 11 of their 12 games straight up against the No. 13 seed, but are 5-7 ATS in those same games. However for 14 seasons between 1990 and 2013, the No. 4 seed covered the number 56% of the time.

The No. 5 seed has been upset often by the No. 12 seed. Since 2009, the No. 5 seed is 11-21 ATS and just 5-11 ATS the past three tournaments. In 18 of the last 21 NCAA tournaments at least one No. 12 seed has beaten a No. 5 seed outright.

The No. 11 seed has been dominating the No. 6 seed since 2009. Dating back to 2009, the No. 11 seed is 19-13 ATS versus No. 6. However, in five consecutive tournaments there has been a No. 11 seed listed as the favorite in this matchup and the favored No. 11 covered and won four of the five games.

No. 7 seeds have done well against No. 10 seeds of late. No. 7 seeds have a record of 11-5 SU versus No. 10 dating back to 2013. The No. 7 seed is 10-6 ATS in those same games.

The underdog has carried the No. 8 vs. No. 9 first round matchup going 20-9-3 against the number the past 8 tournaments.

Comments are closed.